Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662982›Full record

ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026

EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: EARLY VERSUS LATE REPAIR FOR TRAUMATIC ROTATOR CUFF TEARS.

Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara, Paulo Santoro Belangero, Márcio Schiefer, Leonardo Zanesco, Marcos Rassi Fernandes, Joel Murachovsky, João Felipe de Medeiros, Eduardo Angeli Malavolta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paulo Henrique Schmidt LaraEscola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-2071
Paulo Santoro BelangeroEscola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-4742
Márcio SchieferInstituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamil Haddad (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-8261
Leonardo ZanescoUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-7298
Marcos Rassi FernandesUniversidade Federal de Goias, Faculdade de Medicina, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8078-528X
Joel MurachovskyFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-8566
João Felipe de MedeirosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-4566
Eduardo Angeli MalavoltaUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-6445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic rotator cuff tears are acute structural injuries to one or more rotator cuff tendons caused by an identifiable trauma, generally associated with the abrupt onset of pain, weakness, and shoulder dysfunction. They must be distinguished from chronic degenerative tears and from acute injuries superimposed on previously degenerated tendons. The optimal timing of surgical repair remains debated. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL) up to March 2026 to evaluate whether early repair is more effective than late repair for the treatment of traumatic rotator cuff tears, with respect to clinical and functional outcomes, retear, and return to pre-injury activities. The certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Results: Three cohort studies were included. The definition of "early" repair is not standardized in the literature - some authors consider it up to 3 weeks and others up to 6 months - so studies defining "early" as up to 3-4 months were included, which represents a potential source of bias. Functional outcomes were similar between early and late repair, whereas early repair was associated with and a lower likelihood of requiring tendon grafting in larger tears. The certainty of evidence was very low. Conclusion: The surgeon should individually assess patient- and disease-related characteristics to make the best treatment decision. Given the risk of irreparability and longer rehabilitation, the project recommends that, after a traumatic tear, repair be performed as early as possible.

Indexed as

Operative TimeRotator Cuff TearShoulderTendon InjuriesTrauma

Identifiers

PMID42662982
PMCPMC13521581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.