ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026
EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: EARLY VERSUS LATE REPAIR FOR TRAUMATIC ROTATOR CUFF TEARS.
Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic rotator cuff tears are acute structural injuries to one or more rotator cuff tendons caused by an identifiable trauma, generally associated with the abrupt onset of pain, weakness, and shoulder dysfunction. They must be distinguished from chronic degenerative tears and from acute injuries superimposed on previously degenerated tendons. The optimal timing of surgical repair remains debated. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL) up to March 2026 to evaluate whether early repair is more effective than late repair for the treatment of traumatic rotator cuff tears, with respect to clinical and functional outcomes, retear, and return to pre-injury activities. The certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Results: Three cohort studies were included. The definition of "early" repair is not standardized in the literature - some authors consider it up to 3 weeks and others up to 6 months - so studies defining "early" as up to 3-4 months were included, which represents a potential source of bias. Functional outcomes were similar between early and late repair, whereas early repair was associated with and a lower likelihood of requiring tendon grafting in larger tears. The certainty of evidence was very low. Conclusion: The surgeon should individually assess patient- and disease-related characteristics to make the best treatment decision. Given the risk of irreparability and longer rehabilitation, the project recommends that, after a traumatic tear, repair be performed as early as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.