ReviewSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2026
The impact of narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia on work-related outcomes: a systematic literature review.
Review in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The symptoms experienced by people with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) have profound effects on individuals' lives, affecting daily functioning, relationships and mental health, and can impair performance at work or school. Although numerous studies have evaluated the impact of narcolepsy and IH on work-related outcomes, the evidence base is highly fragmented and difficult to meaningfully summarize. We conducted a systematic literature review of published evidence to better understand the impact of these disorders on employment, work productivity, work satisfaction, and related outcomes. We identified 54 publications representing 51 unique studies that met the study inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Although most people with narcolepsy or IH were employed, fewer were in paid work than control populations, and absenteeism and presenteeism were high. Having narcolepsy and IH resulted in lower wages and missed work time, leading to unfavorable impacts on career progression, promotion, job satisfaction, and income. The most frequently reported work-related problems were sleepiness at work, reduced performance, work accidents, and lateness. More severe excessive daytime sleepiness was associated with greater work impairment. Narcolepsy-specific medications that improved excessive daytime sleepiness were reported to improve work productivity in clinical trials; however, many people are left with substantial residual impairment despite treatment. These findings indicate that narcolepsy and IH impose a substantial burden on work functioning and employment, and there is a need for more research to inform interventions and policies aimed at mitigating the impact of these debilitating conditions on individuals' professional lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.