Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662946›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Simplified Heart Failure Clinic Questionnaire: A Practical Patient-Reported Symptom Survey.

Karleena Snow, Arindam Sharma

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karleena SnowCardiology, Heart Failure, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Arindam SharmaAdvanced Heart Failure, Intermountain Health, St. George, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing chronic heart failure (HF) is challenging for clinicians across a variety of specialties. Many of the currently available symptom questionnaires are complex, time-consuming for patients to complete, and costly for providers or institutions to use. We created a simplified questionnaire that patients could easily use in a clinic setting, that would be free for the clinician/institution to use, and that would improve symptom assessment and better guide HF treatment. We implemented it in a pilot program. During our pilot study, we used the Simplified Heart Failure Clinic Questionnaire (SHFCQ) in over 1,000 patients. Still, we give three case examples in this article to show the benefits of using the symptom questionnaire within a variety of HF types. Each patient was given the SHFCQ during their HF clinic visits, and they were educated on its use. Clinicians and patients were able to give feedback about the questionnaire throughout the program, and the SHFCQ underwent three revisions to improve functionality and usability. This illustrative article highlights the preliminary use of the SHFCQ. We found that patients were very receptive to it and that it improved the providers' ability to dive deeper into the patient's reported symptoms and create a more tailored treatment plan. We feel that it has the potential to become a free, easy-to-use tool in the management of HF clinic patients. Further large-scale study is needed to validate the questionnaire's reliability and reproducibility.

Indexed as

free heart failure questionnaireheart failure case reportheart failure management toolpatient-reported outcomes measurementsimplified heart failure questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID42662946
PMCPMC13521430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.