ArticleJSES international2026
Standard-length stems require lower distal filling ratios than short stems to achieve neutral alignment in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Humeral osteotomy rate during revision shoulder arthroplasty for a standard-length uncemented low-filling humeral stem: a multicenter study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Short humeral stems in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have been introduced to reduce stress shielding by decreasing distal filling ratios (DFRs). However, reduced diaphyseal engagement may compromise coronal alignment. This study compared coronal alignment between short and standard-length stems and identified implant-related and bone-related factors associated with malalignment. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with short or standard-length (long) Perform humeral stems (Stryker) were included from 2 institutional registries from 2023-2025. Standardized radiographs were analyzed retrospectively. Coronal alignment was measured on true anteroposterior radiographs at a minimum 6-month follow-up. Malalignment was defined as > 5° deviation. Pre-operative computed tomography assessed metaphyseal cancellous bone density and cortical thickness (Tingart method). Post-operative radiographs were used to measure DFR and metaphyseal collar filling ratio. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Multivariable linear regression evaluated the independent effect of stem type on alignment, adjusting for age, sex, metaphyseal cancellous bone density, and metaphyseal collar filling ratio. A sensitivity model incorporating DFR and stem length assessed the contribution of endosteal contact. Results: A total of 114 patients were included (57 short stems and 57 standard-length stems). Short stems demonstrated greater varus-valgus deviation than standard-length stems (median 3.50° [interquartile range: 1.90°-5.10°] vs. 1.90° [interquartile range: 1.00°-3.90°]; Conclusion: This study demonstrates that standard-length humeral stems are associated with more consistent coronal alignment than short stems, although the clinical significance of this radiographic difference remains unknown. Standard-length stems demonstrated consistent alignment above an observed DFR of 48%, whereas short stems did so above 59%. Stem length independently influenced coronal alignment and allowed stable positioning despite lower DFRs. These findings suggest that greater stem length may permit reduced distal cortical engagement without compromising coronal alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.