Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662884›Full record

ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026

Liquid biopsy in oncology practice: A global survey by the Young Committee of the International Society of Liquid Biopsy (ISLB).

Eleonora Nicolò, Surbhi Singhal, Erick F Saldanha, Xiao Jin, Konstantinos Venetis, Letizia Pontolillo, Shivahamy Maheswaran, Diego de Miguel-Perez, Angelo Dipasquale, Nadia Ghazali and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Eleonora NicolòDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Surbhi SinghalDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Erick F SaldanhaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Xiao JinPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Konstantinos VenetisDivision of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Letizia PontolilloDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Shivahamy MaheswaranUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Diego de Miguel-PerezLiquid Biopsy and Cancer Interception Group, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research, Pfizer/University of Granada/Andalusian Regional Government (GENyO), Granada, Spain.
Angelo DipasqualeMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Nadia GhazaliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada.
Pasquale PisapiaDepartment of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Ana Ortega-FrancoCRUK National Biomarker Centre, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
Mohamed A GoudaDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Benjamin A BleibergDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Canio MartinelliSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Pavel StejskalInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Oriol MirallasDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Enes ErulDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Gilberto MorganThe OncoAlert Network, Sweden.
Xi Kathy ZhouPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Roberto BoreaThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Carolina ReduzziDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liquid biopsy is a transformative tool for precision oncology, yet its clinical use remains variable across healthcare systems, and barriers to its implementation are poorly characterized. This survey aims to assess perceptions and practices related to liquid biopsy in oncology practice worldwide. Methods: A cross sectional, web-based survey was distributed to oncology providers worldwide from November 2024 to December 2025. The survey captured clinical practice characteristics, liquid biopsy uses and workflows, interpretation practices, reimbursement patterns, molecular tumor board (MTB) access, and perceived clinical- and system-level barriers. Descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons were performed across geographic region, country income level, work setting, years in independent practice, and practice type. Results: Responses from 393 participants across 59 countries were analyzed, with 53% practicing in Europe. Most were medical oncologists (90%) self-identified as specialists (68%), practicing in academic centers (78%), and in high-income countries (70%). Liquid biopsy use was variable: 83% of respondents used it in ≤50% of patients, with pronounced differences across all subgroups (all Conclusions: These results highlight the high perceived value of liquid biopsy testing, while informing region- and setting-specific differences and challenges, which could be used to guide strategies to implement liquid biopsy in cancer care worldwide.

Indexed as

Clinical useCTCsctDNADisparitiesImplementation barriersLiquid biopsyMolecular tumor boardReimbursementSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID42662884
PMCPMC13521137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.