ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026
Liquid biopsy in oncology practice: A global survey by the Young Committee of the International Society of Liquid Biopsy (ISLB).
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liquid biopsy is a transformative tool for precision oncology, yet its clinical use remains variable across healthcare systems, and barriers to its implementation are poorly characterized. This survey aims to assess perceptions and practices related to liquid biopsy in oncology practice worldwide. Methods: A cross sectional, web-based survey was distributed to oncology providers worldwide from November 2024 to December 2025. The survey captured clinical practice characteristics, liquid biopsy uses and workflows, interpretation practices, reimbursement patterns, molecular tumor board (MTB) access, and perceived clinical- and system-level barriers. Descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons were performed across geographic region, country income level, work setting, years in independent practice, and practice type. Results: Responses from 393 participants across 59 countries were analyzed, with 53% practicing in Europe. Most were medical oncologists (90%) self-identified as specialists (68%), practicing in academic centers (78%), and in high-income countries (70%). Liquid biopsy use was variable: 83% of respondents used it in ≤50% of patients, with pronounced differences across all subgroups (all Conclusions: These results highlight the high perceived value of liquid biopsy testing, while informing region- and setting-specific differences and challenges, which could be used to guide strategies to implement liquid biopsy in cancer care worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.