Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662869›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2026

Benefits of high-magnification and color information in computational pathology-An exploratory review.

Nico Haisch, Friederike Liesche-Starnecker, Gregor Grambow, Daniel Hieber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nico HaischDept. of Computer Science, Aalen University, Beethovenstraße 1, Aalen 73430, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Friederike Liesche-StarneckerInstitute of Neuropathology, Ulm University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, Ulm 89081, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Gregor GrambowDept. of Computer Science, Aalen University, Beethovenstraße 1, Aalen 73430, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Daniel HieberInstitute of Neuropathology, Ulm University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, Ulm 89081, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The analysis of gigapixel high-resolution whole-slide images (WSIs) with rich color information using deep learning (DL) models is a routine task in computational pathology (CPath). However, the necessity of such information-rich inputs remains insufficiently explored. Objectives: This literature study aims to collect evidence for the benefit, or its absence, of using WSIs with high magnification levels and full color information in CPath DL models. Methods: Due to the scarcity of domain-specific studies, the exploratory review includes research from related domains, such as broader medical imaging and computer vision in general. The search was conducted using different permutations of keywords in established databases such as IEEE Xplore and PubMed. The retrieved literature was pre-screened by a researcher and relevant work was screened by two researchers independently. Results: The analyzed literature reinforces the lack of direct empirical evidence for using high magnification WSIs with full color information in CPath. Conversely, some findings suggest that reducing image resolution can often maintain high DL accuracy for many classification and detection tasks. Similarly, thoughtful reduction of color information, such as advanced grayscale conversions, can preserve critical diagnostic features with minimal impact on DL performance. Conclusion: The review underscores the need to critically re-examine prevailing conventions on WSI magnification and color usage to optimize DL-driven CPath applications. The lack of direct evidence warrants further research and the establishment of reliable benchmarks in this domain.

Indexed as

Color informationComputational pathologyDeep learningHigh-resolutionLiterature reviewMagnificationWhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID42662869
PMCPMC13521022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.