ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Impact of an Emergency Triage Nursing Strategy on Early Recognition and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Pre-Post Case-Note Review.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sepsis, Patient Monitoring and Nursing Research.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a nurse-led "Identify-Alert-Act" three-step triage strategy on early sepsis recognition and clinical outcomes in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This single-center retrospective pre-post case-note review enrolled 178 adult ED patients with sepsis who met the Sepsis-3 criteria between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients managed during the routine triage period were defined as the comparator group (86 patients), whereas patients managed after full implementation of the structured nurse-led triage strategy were defined as the intervention-period group (92 patients). The strategy incorporated dual-track screening with the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), nurse-led zero-level interventions, and expedited fast-track pathway activation. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU admission within 28 days, ED length of stay, key triage-to-treatment time intervals, vasoactive agent use, and requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation. Separate multivariable logistic regression models were constructed for ICU admission within 28 days and 28-day all-cause mortality. The ICU admission model included study period, age, baseline full SOFA score, initial lactate level, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, whereas the mortality model included study period, baseline full SOFA score, and initial lactate level. Results: The intervention-period group had shorter median times to early warning trigger (15.00 [12.25, 18.00] vs 29.50 [18.00, 43.00] min; Z, -7.28; P<0.001), point-of-care lactate measurement (32.00 [23.00, 44.75] vs 42.00 [25.75, 59.25] min; Z, -2.23; P, 0.026), blood culture collection (33.00 [23.00, 45.75] vs 41.50 [28.75, 57.25] min; Z, -2.52; P, 0.012), and first empirical antibacterial administration (54.00 [33.00, 78.75] vs 90.00 [62.75, 116.00] min; Z, -6.02; P<0.001). ED length of stay was also reduced in the intervention-period group (4.55 [3.53, 6.78] vs 6.45 [4.30, 9.20] hours; Z, -3.55; P<0.001). ICU admission within 28 days was lower in the intervention-period group than in the comparator group (28/92 [30.43%] vs 41/86 [47.67%]; χ Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective pre-post study, the structured nurse-led triage strategy was associated with earlier sepsis recognition, shorter treatment delays, reduced ED length of stay, and lower ICU admission within 28 days. No statistically significant reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality was observed. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and require further validation in prospective multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.