ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Vitamin D deficiency and long-term risk of female genital cancer: a multicenter real-world cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A growing body of evidence implicates vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in carcinogenesis, yet evidence linking VDD to female genital cancers remains inconsistent, with most studies evaluating individual cancer subtypes in isolation using heterogeneous designs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Female adults aged ≥30 years with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D <20 ng/mL (VDD group) were matched 1:1 with those with levels ≥30 ng/mL (control group). A 2-year landmark design was used to reduce reverse causation. The primary outcome was incident overall female genital cancer within 10 years. Secondary outcomes included ovarian, cervical, and corpus uteri cancers, and all-cause mortality. Results: After matching, 675,079 patients were included in each group. VDD was associated with a higher risk of overall female genital cancer compared with normal vitamin D status [hazard ratio (HR), 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38-1.55, Conclusion: This multicenter real-world cohort study demonstrated that VDD was associated with a higher long-term risk of overall female genital cancer and its major subtypes. Given the observational design and the absence of a clear exposure-gradient pattern, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal and warrant further prospective investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.