ReviewCureus2026
Peri-Implantitis: Biofilm-Induced Disease or Prosthetically Driven Complication?
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peri-implantitis is a prevalent biological complication of implant therapy; however, whether it should be understood primarily as a biofilm-induced infection or as a consequence of prosthetically driven mechanical factors remains unclear. This narrative review synthesizes microbiological, biomechanical, and prosthetic evidence to address this question from an interdisciplinary perspective. Peri-implant biofilms occupy a distinct microbial niche, and their dysbiotic transition and the accompanying host response appear to be central to disease initiation, while an implant-directed foreign body reaction may contribute independently to bone loss. Occlusal overload, residual cement, and unfavorable emergence angles or contours do not independently initiate disease but consistently accelerate progression once inflammation is established, with wide emergence angles and cemented restorations with residual material showing particularly strong associations with the marginal bone loss. Epidemiological data confirm a multifactorial risk profile in which a history of periodontitis, smoking, and systemic conditions interact with local biofilms and prosthetic factors. Clinically, these findings support the integration of restorative, periodontal, and relevant endodontic assessments into implant treatment planning and long-term supportive care, as prosthetic design functions as a modifiable determinant of peri-implant health rather than a purely esthetic or mechanical consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.