ArticleCase reports in orthopedics2026
Transphyseal Separation of the Distal Humerus in a 5-Year-Old Child: A Rare Case Report.
Article in Case reports in orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transphyseal Separation of the Distal Humerus in a 5-Year-Old Child: A Rare Case Report.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transphyseal separation of the distal humerus (TSDH) is an uncommon injury, typically seen in children under 3 years of age, with very few cases reported beyond this age group. Diagnosing this injury is challenging due to its cartilaginous nature. TSDH in infants is commonly treated with manual reduction and long-arm cast application; however, a few case series have suggested that surgical treatment may be a better option in older children. Case Summary: A 5-year-old boy presented with left elbow swelling and restricted movements after a fall on an outstretched hand 2 days earlier. On physical examination, the three-point bony relationship was maintained, and the distal neurovascular status was intact. Radiographs of the left elbow joint showed posteromedial displacement of the radioulnar complex with maintained radio-capitellar line. The TSDH was suspected, and intraoperative arthrography was planned. The diagnosis of TSDH was confirmed intraoperatively with the aid of arthrography. The patient underwent closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation after confirming optimal alignment. Postoperatively, the elbow was immobilized using an above-elbow posterior slab. At 5 weeks, the slab was removed, and gradual range-of-motion exercises were initiated. At the 2-month follow-up, the child had a satisfactory range of motion. At the 15-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated an excellent, pain-free range of motion with no residual deformity or radiographic abnormalities. Conclusion: The TSDH in older children is a rare entity. The accurate reduction and timely diagnosis should be given priority so as to avoid late complications. If appropriate intervention is done ensuring adequate reduction and stable fixation, even with limited resources, excellent results can be achieved in such challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.