Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

An exploratory study comparing the social behavior of intersex and female goats.

Océane Schmitt, David Schmitz-Lamping, Gesine Lühken, Gerriet Trei, Uta König von Borstel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Océane SchmittAnimal Husbandry, Behaviour and Welfare, Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
David Schmitz-LampingFachgebiet Ökologische Tierhaltung, Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde (FH), Eberswalde, Germany.
Gesine LühkenAnimal and Pathogenetics, Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Gerriet TreiFachgebiet Ökologische Tierhaltung, Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde (FH), Eberswalde, Germany.
Uta König von BorstelAnimal Husbandry, Behaviour and Welfare, Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Goats are highly social animals that establish complex hierarchical and affiliative relationships within their herds. Understanding these social dynamics is fundamental to optimize animal welfare in sustainable livestock systems. In goats, a natural genetic variant causes dominant absence of horns (polledness). As this variant also has an influence on sex development (polled intersex syndrome, PIS), breeding for polledness can result in a higher proportion of intersexual goats in a flock. However, little is known about the behavioral roles and social integration of intersex goats within herds. Methods: This study compares the social behavior in a closed group of intersex ( Results: Intersex goats showed a significantly higher frequency of affiliative interactions compared with females, suggesting enhanced social connectedness. No significant difference was found in agonistic interaction frequency, but intersex goats fought with significantly fewer opponents than female goats. Discussion: Although the analysis should be repeated in other herds, these findings offer novel insights into the social behavior of intersex goats and suggest that they may contribute to social cohesion rather than conflict in a herd.

Indexed as

animal welfarehierarchyhornlessnessintersexualitysocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID42662685
PMCPMC13520204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.