Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662681›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026

Evaluation of postoperative pain and antibacterial efficacy of nanochitosan and sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: A randomized controlled trial.

L Krishna Prasad, Safiya Nikhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Krishna PrasadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, Karnataka, India.
Safiya NikhatDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The long-term success of root canal treatment depends on effective elimination of microorganisms from the root canal system using chemical irrigants before obturation. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the most commonly used irrigant in endodontic therapy; however, it has certain limitations, such as high surface tension that restricts penetration into lateral canals and isthmuses. Therefore, newer irrigants with improved antimicrobial properties are being explored. Recently, nanoparticles have been introduced as potential antimicrobial agents for root canal disinfection. Aim and Objective: The aim and objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative pain (POP) and antibacterial effectiveness of 0.2% nanochitosan and 2% NaOCl irrigating solutions during routine endodontic procedures in young adults. Subjects and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 single-rooted teeth. After rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation and working length determination were performed. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: Group I - 2% NaOCl and Group II - 0.2% nanochitosan as irrigants during cleaning and shaping. Pre- and postirrigation microbial samples were collected, and bacterial load was assessed by counting colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). POP was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. Results: Both irrigants showed a significant reduction in bacterial counts. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of antibacterial effectiveness or POP. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, 0.2% nanochitosan demonstrated antibacterial effectiveness and POP outcomes comparable to 2% NaOCl, suggesting its potential as an alternative irrigant in routine endodontic procedures.

Indexed as

Colony-forming unit countnanochitosanpostoperative painsodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID42662681
PMCPMC13521538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.