ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Hearing thresholds above age- and sex-based norms and an under-recognized hearing screening gap in short-haul truck drivers in Los Angeles, California: a cross-sectional pilot study.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterize hearing, noise behaviors, and awareness of hearing difficulty in predominantly Hispanic/Latino short-haul truck drivers, and to compare measured thresholds with age- and sex-based norms. Methods: In this cross-sectional pilot study we studied 50 short-haul truck drivers in Los Angeles, California, USA, in July 2023. Each completed a health and noise survey and automated audiometry from 250 to 8000 Hz; workplace and in-cab sound levels were measured with a smartphone meter. Thresholds were compared with ISO 7029:2017 age- and sex-based normative values, including their position within the normative distribution. Results: Mean age was 51.8 years; 88.6% identified as Hispanic/Latino and 87.0% used no hearing protection. Thresholds exceeded normative medians at every frequency; the sample median fell at or above the 76th percentile across frequencies, most extreme at low frequencies. In an exploratory model, age was associated with the better-ear pure-tone average; years of driving, noise sensitivity, and cardiovascular risk showed no independent association. Among drivers with measured high-frequency loss, 59% reported no perceived decline. Conclusions: Short-haul truck drivers had hearing poorer than age- and sex-based norms across frequencies, rarely used protection, and were often unaware of measurable loss. These findings support accessible hearing screening and protection in this underserved workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.