ArticleACS omega2026
Carbonate Acidizing: Effect of Additives on Reactivity and Wormhole Development.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reduction in productivity in carbonate reservoirs is often associated with near-wellbore formation damage, making matrix acidizing an essential strategy to restore permeability. In this context, treatment efficiency depends on the balance between reaction kinetics and mass transport, which governs the formation of dominant wormholes. Although additives such as corrosion inhibitors and emulsion preventers are widely used for operational purposes, their effects on the reactive behavior of acid systems remain poorly understood. This study investigates the influence of commercial additives on HCl-based acid systems, using an additive-free system (NA) as a reference. An emulsion preventer (EP), a corrosion inhibitor (CI), and a formulation containing both additives (BA) were evaluated. The EP and CI were used at concentrations of 0.2 and 0.5 vol %, respectively, and the BA formulation contained both additives at the same concentrations. The formulations were evaluated through physicochemical characterization, carbonate dissolution kinetics, and reactive-flow experiments performed on Indiana Limestone samples (18.4% average porosity and 123 mD average permeability) during the injection of 15 wt % HCl until breakthrough. The presence of additives led to a significant reduction in surface tension, suggesting changes in interfacial conditions. Batch reactor experiments showed a pronounced retardation in dissolution kinetics, with reaction times increasing by approximately 4.5-fold, 30.6-fold, and 18.2-fold for the EP, CI, and BA systems, respectively, compared with NA. In reactive-flow experiments, the minimum pore volume to breakthrough (PV
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.