ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Navigating the pause-patient experiences with perioperative anticoagulation interruption: a qualitative study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients on chronic anticoagulation frequently undergo temporary medication interruption for surgical or invasive procedures, yet the patient perspective on this experience remains poorly characterized. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the concerns, preferences, and unmet needs of patients undergoing perioperative anticoagulation interruption to inform patient-centered care strategies. Methods: A qualitative study using 7 semistructured focus groups was conducted between 2022 and 2023 at a single academic health system. Twenty-two adults on chronic oral anticoagulation who had recently undergone planned interruption for high-risk procedures were enrolled. Groups were stratified by anticoagulant type (warfarin vs direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC]). Emergent themes from focus group transcripts were identified using grounded theory with iterative open coding and consensus analysis via Dedoose software. Results: Nineteen themes were identified and consolidated into 5 core categories: (1) Risk Perception, reflecting fears of bleeding and clotting shaped by personal history; (2) Communication and Instruction Clarity, emphasizing the need for clear, timely guidance; (3) Self-Management and Logistical Challenges, including difficulties with injections, medication tracking, and dietary management; (4) Healthcare System Gaps, including care coordination failures and access delays; and (5) Emotional and Adaptive Responses, including stress and creative coping strategies. Bruising and injection challenges were more prominent concerns than major clinical events. Conclusion: Perioperative anticoagulation interruption poses substantial informational, emotional, and logistical burdens on patients. Enhancing communication, supporting self-management, and improving system coordination are essential components of anticoagulation stewardship. Integration of patient-reported outcomes into future trials is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.