Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662587›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Scenarios of Engineered Membranes in Cultural Heritage: How Do Membranes Act on Microclimates and Microenvironments?

Annarosa Gugliuzza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Annarosa GugliuzzaNational Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Research Institute on Membrane Technology "Enrico Drioli"- (ITM), via Pietro Bucci 17C, Rende, Cosenza 87036, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-8695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation is one of the critical issues for cultural heritage assets. A lot of materials are daily proposed to clean, repair, and restore monuments, but best practices are still in high demand to prevent artwork deterioration. Membrane science provides practical and sustainable solutions, including buffer environmental zones, to preserve cultural assets from physical, chemical, and biological agents. Protection can be obtained in an outdoor context in order to counteract the effects of climatic changes, variations of temperature, violent storms, bright lighting, and the wear of time. Removable and aesthetic structural membranes are hence proposed to give protection and a comfortable environment without affecting the meaning of the historical monuments. Similarly, indoor membrane-based solutions can be applied to versatile situations, yielding surroundings targeted for specific classes of materials. Required ambiences may be identified, and regulation of levels of humidity, gases, and vapors, as well as fluctuations of heat can be established. Air cleaning can be obtained through the elimination of nanoparticles and dust, while bacteria, fungi, molds, and viruses can be in situ neutralized. Water infiltration and salt crystallization can be hindered. The membrane concept relies on the capability to transfer mass, energy, and charge through an interface under specific working conditions and can be easily adapted to the space needing protection. Due to their ability to perceive changes in the local environment, responsive membranes can be further aimed at realizing intelligent devices if integrated with AIoT monitoring tools. Different contexts are herein analyzed and discussed, highlighting the great potential of using advanced materials-membranes to keep balanced and clean ambiences for safe and wholesome cultural assets. Case studies are reported on how new sustainable practices can make preventive action efficient, quick, and durable, resulting in much more effective and resourceful conservation. Current status, potential membrane applications, and future perspectives are herein described in order to provide answers to some of the most important questions in works of art conservation, which are still unsolved or partially solved.

Identifiers

PMID42662587
PMCPMC13520002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.