ArticleACS omega2026
Comparison of ESI and APPI for the Detection of Nitro Explosives Using Differential Mobility Mass Spectrometry.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and reliable detection of explosive residues is critical for security applications (e.g., counterterrorism) and environmental health contexts (e.g., legacy military site contamination). Key target analytes among nitro-organic explosives encompass 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), hexogen (RDX), pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) as well as 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT, a common military-grade TNT impurity) and 2-amino-4,6-dinitroluene (2A-DNT, a microbial degradation product of TNT). Ion mobility spectrometry is one of the key technologies for fast and reliable detection of explosives. When coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), it enables high sensitivity and precise analyte identification. In this study, a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) coupled to a triple quadrupole MS was utilized to compare two relatively orthogonal ionization techniquesatmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) and electrospray ionization (ESI)for explosive trace detection in calibration standards and soil extracts, applied via liquid injection or via thermal desorption from filters. Both ionization techniques showed good linearity and enabled sensitive detection of the tested explosives. While APPI showed increased sensitivity toward dinitrotoluenes (DNT, 2A-DNT), ESI performed significantly better for TNT, RDX, and PETN but failed to detect DNT via thermal desorption. Both ionization techniques were further applied to the analysis of explosives in soil extracts, providing meaningful insights into their applicability for field sample analysis and revealing distinct effects of matrix components on ion source behavior and detection performance. The study underscores the practical relevance of the approach while offering a balanced evaluation of the methodological strengths and limitations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.