Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662579›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Comparison of ESI and APPI for the Detection of Nitro Explosives Using Differential Mobility Mass Spectrometry.

Vanessa Lünsmann, René Breuch, Silvia A M Herrmann, Kostyantin Konstantynovski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanessa LünsmannInstitute for the Protection of Terrestrial Infrastructures, German Aerospace Center, Rathausallee 12, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.
René BreuchInstitute for the Protection of Terrestrial Infrastructures, German Aerospace Center, Rathausallee 12, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-1283
Silvia A M HerrmannHochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Safety and Security Research, von-Liebig-Str. 20, 53359 Rheinbach, Germany.
Kostyantin KonstantynovskiInstitute for the Protection of Terrestrial Infrastructures, German Aerospace Center, Rathausallee 12, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and reliable detection of explosive residues is critical for security applications (e.g., counterterrorism) and environmental health contexts (e.g., legacy military site contamination). Key target analytes among nitro-organic explosives encompass 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), hexogen (RDX), pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) as well as 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT, a common military-grade TNT impurity) and 2-amino-4,6-dinitroluene (2A-DNT, a microbial degradation product of TNT). Ion mobility spectrometry is one of the key technologies for fast and reliable detection of explosives. When coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), it enables high sensitivity and precise analyte identification. In this study, a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) coupled to a triple quadrupole MS was utilized to compare two relatively orthogonal ionization techniquesatmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) and electrospray ionization (ESI)for explosive trace detection in calibration standards and soil extracts, applied via liquid injection or via thermal desorption from filters. Both ionization techniques showed good linearity and enabled sensitive detection of the tested explosives. While APPI showed increased sensitivity toward dinitrotoluenes (DNT, 2A-DNT), ESI performed significantly better for TNT, RDX, and PETN but failed to detect DNT via thermal desorption. Both ionization techniques were further applied to the analysis of explosives in soil extracts, providing meaningful insights into their applicability for field sample analysis and revealing distinct effects of matrix components on ion source behavior and detection performance. The study underscores the practical relevance of the approach while offering a balanced evaluation of the methodological strengths and limitations.

Identifiers

PMID42662579
PMCPMC13520020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.