ReviewSynthetic and systems biotechnology2027
Strategies and applications for alleviating carbon catabolite repression.
Review in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is a widespread regulatory strategy across diverse microorganisms that prioritises the utilisation of preferred carbon sources. In industrial bioprocesses, however, CCR-mediated substrate hierarchy can delay the utilisation of secondary carbon sources in mixed feedstock, thereby extending fermentation time and limiting carbon conversion efficiency toward target products. Existing reviews have largely addressed CCR in a microorganism-specific manner, potentially obscuring conserved principles, limiting cross-species comparisons, and constraining generalisable engineering; computational modelling and engineering applications also remain underrepresented. This review therefore first summarises CCR mechanisms across diverse microorganisms through a common systems-level framework, in which transport-linked sensing converts carbon flux into intracellular signals, transcriptional regulators reprogramme genome-wide expression, RNA-based mechanisms fine-tune the timing and magnitude of responses, and protein stability shapes their persistence. Multi-omics approaches, particularly interactomics and single-cell omics, are then highlighted for revealing CCR as a dynamic and multilayered regulatory system by resolving interaction networks, temporal changes, and cell-to-cell heterogeneity beyond bulk measurements. Quantitative computational modelling is also discussed, with emphasis on kinetic and constraint-based frameworks that connect regulatory mechanisms to metabolic flux and predict system behaviour under changing carbon substrates. Engineering strategies, including adaptive laboratory evolution, transcription factor engineering, transporter and promoter engineering, and pathway rewiring, are further compared for the relief of CCR and improvement of substrate co-utilisation and production performance. Finally, these advances are presented within a Design-Build-Test-Learn framework, through which mechanistic discovery and omics-scale analysis are used to inform model development, and modelling and engineering are iteratively coupled to improve microbial performance. We propose that such an integrative paradigm is emerging as a unifying direction for CCR research, and provides a foundation for rational strain design and more efficient, sustainable biomanufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.