ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026
ZCAT: Zero-shot cross-crop annotation transfer-A new paradigm leveraging plant organ similarity.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inflorescence is a key yield-determining organ, yet its complex morphology makes manual pixel-level annotation time-consuming, leading to a scarcity of high-quality segmentation datasets. To address this bottleneck, we propose ZCAT (Zero-shot Cross-crop Annotation Transfer), a novel paradigm for zero-annotation cross-crop pseudo-mask screening. ZCAT completely eliminates pixel-level manual annotation of the target crop, requiring only holistic quality assessment of model-generated pseudo-masks (5-10 s per image). Specifically, we train a SegFormer model on public rice panicle datasets (CVRP and RiceSEG) and transfer it across crops to the wheat spike segmentation task. The key innovation is the introduction of a human-defined quality function Q, which circumvents the fundamental challenge in self-learning algorithms: the inability of computers to autonomously distinguish good masks from bad ones. Through iterative human-in-the-loop pseudo-label screening with a curriculum learning strategy, each round adds only a few high-quality pseudo-masks to the training set, continuously improving model performance. After four iterations, ZCAT produces pseudo-masks with an average Spike IoU of 0.7003, evaluated against the GWFSS manual annotations as ground truth. Moreover, the pseudo-mask dataset exhibited higher benchmark performance than the GWFSS manual annotations (Spike IoU 0.7612 vs. 0.7027; mIoU 0.8627 vs. 0.8247), suggesting stronger self-consistency. A generalization test on a strictly held-out set of 100 manually annotated wheat spike images showed that the model trained on ZCAT-generated pseudo-masks achieved marginally better performance than that trained on the GWFSS manual annotations (Spike IoU: 0.5112 vs. 0.4927; mIoU: 0.5627 vs. 0.5247). The time budget of the ZCAT pipeline was substantially lower than that of manual annotation. ZCAT opens a new pathway for rapid annotation of plant reproductive structures or other organs and significantly reduces data preparation costs in plant phenomics. The generated wheat spike pseudo-mask dataset and the mask quality screening tool (Mask Quality Screener) are open-sourced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.