ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Comparative efficacy and safety of tension band wiring versus plate fixation for olecranon fractures: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of displaced olecranon fractures remains controversial. Surgeons must weigh the lower cost of tension band wiring (TBW) against the stability of plate fixation (PF). This study utilizes recent Level I evidence and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to determine if cumulative data are sufficient to draw preliminary conclusions based on the available randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2025. Eligible studies compared TBW versus PF in adults with displaced fractures. Outcomes included functional scores (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH], Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS]), complications, reoperation rates, and costs. TSA was employed to control for Type I/II errors and evaluate the futility of further testing. Several outcomes, including MEPS, forearm rotation arc, and total complications, are derived from only 2 studies and should be considered exploratory rather than definitive pooled estimates. Results: Three high-quality RCTs (Mayo 2A/2B) were included. No statistically significant differences appeared for DASH ( Conclusion: Current randomized evidence suggests that TBW and PF may yield similar functional outcomes for displaced olecranon fractures; however, these findings are based on a limited number of RCTs, with several secondary outcomes derived from only 2 studies. TSA supports functional equivalence for DASH and forearm rotation arc, though evidence is insufficient for other functional parameters. TBW is associated with higher rates of secondary surgery, largely driven by symptomatic hardware removal rather than true fixation failure, with no significant increase in revision surgery rates. No statistically significant difference in overall health-care costs was observed. Given the limited RCT evidence, heterogeneity in fracture types, and variability in cost reporting, these findings should be interpreted with caution and further high-quality, fracture-subtype-stratified trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.