Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662544›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Animal models of gut microbiota-male reproductive interactions: methodological assessment, translational bottlenecks, and optimization strategies.

Yong Ma, Xuewen Diao, Zulong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yong Ma *The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine Department of Andrology, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuewen Diao *The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine Department of Andrology, Zhengzhou, China.
Zulong WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine Department of Andrology, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic infertility accounts for 30%-40% of male infertility cases, yet its etiology remains largely unexplained. The gut-testis axis hypothesis has recently emerged as a promising direction, with human cohort studies revealing statistical associations between gut dysbiosis and impaired semen quality. However, establishing mechanistic and causal evidence beyond observational associations requires complementary approaches, including animal models. Whether current models adequately capture the chronic, low-grade nature of gut-derived insults that may contribute to idiopathic infertility remains insufficiently examined. Here, we examine the methodological foundations of gut-testis axis animal models. We organize them according to the tier of causal question they address and evaluate their internal, external, and construct validity. Our analysis identifies a recurring pattern in which some existing models, particularly those testing the effects of individual molecular pathways, employ exposure magnitudes, routes, and time scales that may not fully reflect the prolonged, low-intensity disturbances hypothesized in gut-driven reproductive injury. The collective efforts of these model categories have identified several signaling axes that, under defined experimental conditions, can measurably affect the testis. However, the internal and external validity limitations of many of these models warrant caution when interpreting these demonstrations of conditional biological capacity as direct evidence that the same pathways carry etiological weight in human idiopathic infertility. To bridge this gap, we propose a logical framework for evaluating causal evidence that transitions from establishing a pathway's biological capacity to assessing its etiological contribution. This framework is anchored on three criteria: endogenous signal origin, pathomimetic exposure profile, and attributive exclusivity. We further propose a preliminary reporting framework, termed Minimal Information for Gut-Testis Axis Rodent Studies (MIGTARS), to support more transparent and methodologically informative reporting. These proposals together provide a methodological scaffold for moving the gut-testis field from pathway verification toward translational modeling.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfertility, MaleReproductionTestisAnimalsDysbiosisHumansMaleTranslational Research, Biomedicalanimal modelsetiological inferencegut–testis axisidiopathic male infertilitymethodological validitytranslational modeling

Identifiers

PMID42662544
PMCPMC13519916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.