Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662510›Full record

ArticleJSES international2026

Clinical utility of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene polymerase chain reaction versus tissue culture in shoulder periprosthetic joint infections.

Collin N Nguyen, Jack H Drake, Mark M Mounajjed, Eric J Cotter, Brian F Grogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Collin N NguyenUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Jack H DrakeUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Mark M MounajjedDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Eric J CotterDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Brian F GroganDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic joint infection remains challenging, particularly in the setting of indolent organisms. Broad-range 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (RNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with sequencing has been proposed as an adjunct to culture; however, its diagnostic performance in revision shoulder arthroplasty using periprosthetic tissue remains incompletely defined. Methods: Single center retrospective study of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases in which both intraoperative periprosthetic tissue cultures and broad-range 16S rRNA gene PCR with sequencing were obtained which is routine at the study center. Five deep periprosthetic tissue specimens from the glenoid and/or humeral bone-implant interfaces were cultured aerobically and anaerobically for a minimum of 14 days. For molecular testing, 5 tissue specimens were pooled and homogenized prior to automated DNA extraction, real-time PCR amplification, sequencing, and organism identification using SmartGene IDNS. The microbiologic reference standard for infection was defined as classified by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM). Diagnostic performance of 16S PCR was calculated relative to this reference. Agreement between 16S PCR and culture was assessed using Cohen κ. Results: Fifty-nine revision cases were included; 18 met the 2018 ICM criteria for infection and 41 were classified as not infected. Relative to the ICM-confirmed causative organism, 16S PCR yielded 0 true positives, 18 false negatives, 6 false positives, and 35 true negatives. Sensitivity was 0.0%, specificity was 85.4%, positive predictive value was not calculable (no true positives identified), negative predictive value was 66.0%, and overall accuracy was 59.3%. Overall agreement was 66.1% with only slight chance-corrected agreement (Cohen κ = 0.087). Conclusion: In this shoulder-specific cohort, 16S rRNA gene PCR demonstrated low observed sensitivity, poor organism-level concordance with tissue culture, and limited clinical utility. Routine use of 16S PCR in revision shoulder arthroplasty cannot be supported based on the findings of the present study. Its role may be limited to select cases with high clinical suspicion and negative bacterial cultures, though further prospective study is needed.

Indexed as

16S rRNA PCRCutibacterium acnesDiagnostic accuracyMolecular diagnosticsPeriprosthetic joint infectionRevision shoulder arthroplastyTissue culture

Identifiers

PMID42662510
PMCPMC13521083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.