Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder presenting with internal dialogue: a case report.

Doudou Yu, Xinchuan Lu, Ju Gao

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doudou Yu *Department of Psychiatry, Yangzhou Wutaishan Hospital of Jiangsu, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xinchuan Lu *Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Guangji Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ju GaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Guangji Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adolescents may present with predominantly internal cognitive symptoms rather than overt rituals. Intrusive thoughts experienced as an inner dialogue may resemble psychotic symptoms, particularly if depressive symptoms and functional impairment are present. Such presentations may be difficult to recognize in clinical practice. Case presentation: This case report describes a 16-year-old girl with an eight-month history of school refusal and intrusive thoughts. She experienced repetitive mental reviewing and vivid internal dialogues but recognized them as her own thoughts. Depressive symptoms were also present. There were no fixed delusional beliefs or externally perceived hallucinations. The diagnosis was OCD with predominantly mental compulsions. Sertraline combined with psychotherapy produced minimal improvement. Given the limited response, the treatment plan was adjusted. Treatment with vortioxetine and low-dose aripiprazole was followed by symptom reduction and a gradual return to school. Conclusions: This case describes an atypical adolescent OCD presentation in which inner dialogic intrusive experiences and depressive symptoms obscured the underlying obsessive pathology. Careful phenomenological assessment is important to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed treatment in similar cases. Symptom improvement was observed after treatment modification, although the relative contribution of medication changes, psychotherapy, family support, symptom fluctuation, and school re-engagement cannot be determined in a single case.

Indexed as

adolescentdifferential diagnosisinternal dialoguemental compulsionsobsessive–compulsive disorder

Identifiers

PMID42662483
PMCPMC13519806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.