ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Fast robot-to-iOCT calibration using conical geometry and 2D cross-scan OCT.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Accurate spatial registration between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and robotic coordinate systems is critical for OCT-guided microsurgery, where precise tool localization is essential for safe, reliable intervention. Aim: We propose and validate a practical and accurate method for calibrating the transformation between OCT and robot coordinate systems in robotic microsurgical systems. Approach: A conical calibration tool rigidly attached to the robot wrist was scanned using fast 2D OCT cross-sections. After denoising, edge extraction, and two-line fitting, the cone tip was localized, and the resulting coordinates were incorporated into a vector-based three-point calibration to recover the OCT-to-robot transformation. The method supports both manual and automated operation, including pose adjustment to improve scan-plane alignment. Results: Experiments with a swept-source OCT system, a Meca500 robot, and a 3D-printed calibration tool showed stable registration across the OCT working range. The method also remained robust in the presence of OCT noise and moderate manufacturing imperfections of the cone geometry. The single cone-tip localization repeatability was estimated to be Conclusions: The proposed cone-based framework provides a practical and accurate solution for routine robot-to-OCT calibration in high-precision surgical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.