Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662427›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2026

Variables associated with patient-reported outcomes and their trajectories following lower extremity free flap reconstruction.

Mike Westmeijer, Emile B List, Rutger M Schols, Antonius J M Luijsterburg, E S J van der Beek, J Henk Coert, Falco Hietbrink, Wiesje Maarse, Teun Teunis, David D Krijgh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mike WestmeijerDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Emile B ListDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rutger M ScholsDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Antonius J M LuijsterburgDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E S J van der BeekDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Henk CoertDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Falco HietbrinkDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wiesje MaarseDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Teun TeunisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA.
David D KrijghDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dangle Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of potentially modifiable variables influencing the recovery and the trajectory of recovery after lower limb salvage with free flap reconstruction might aid in improving outcomes and support targeted rehabilitation strategies. Therefore, we asked: (1) what variables are independently associated with capability, quality of life, and discomfort, and their trajectory? (2) Is there a difference in recovery trajectories between specific capability tasks? Methods: Patients who were enrolled in the "Dangle study" and underwent lower extremity free flap reconstruction at four Dutch academic medical centers were invited to complete patient-reported outcome measures. Capability was assessed using PROMIS Physical Function - Mobility, quality of life using the EQ-5D-5 L, and discomfort using a numerical visual analogue scale (VAS). Questionnaires were completed at various times after surgery. Linear mixed-effects models were used to account for the repeated measures design. Results: Fifty-one participants completed 113 questionnaires. Male sex and the absence of diabetes were independently associated with greater capability, but not with recovery trajectories. Only time since reconstruction was independently associated with greater quality of life. Reconstructions of the foot were associated with increased levels of discomfort compared to lower leg reconstructions, but not with the trajectory of discomfort. Individual capability subscales demonstrated largely stable recovery trajectories without clinically meaningful differences between tasks. Conclusion: Although the variables identified are mostly non-modifiable, they can inform appropriate expectations before and after deciding on limb salvage. In addition, they can help identify people at greater risk for reduced recovery, who might benefit from targeted interventions such as the integrated involvement of rehabilitation, mental health, and pain management services.

Indexed as

Free flapLong-term outcomesLower extremityReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42662427
PMCPMC13520620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.