ArticleJPRAS open2026
Variables associated with patient-reported outcomes and their trajectories following lower extremity free flap reconstruction.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of potentially modifiable variables influencing the recovery and the trajectory of recovery after lower limb salvage with free flap reconstruction might aid in improving outcomes and support targeted rehabilitation strategies. Therefore, we asked: (1) what variables are independently associated with capability, quality of life, and discomfort, and their trajectory? (2) Is there a difference in recovery trajectories between specific capability tasks? Methods: Patients who were enrolled in the "Dangle study" and underwent lower extremity free flap reconstruction at four Dutch academic medical centers were invited to complete patient-reported outcome measures. Capability was assessed using PROMIS Physical Function - Mobility, quality of life using the EQ-5D-5 L, and discomfort using a numerical visual analogue scale (VAS). Questionnaires were completed at various times after surgery. Linear mixed-effects models were used to account for the repeated measures design. Results: Fifty-one participants completed 113 questionnaires. Male sex and the absence of diabetes were independently associated with greater capability, but not with recovery trajectories. Only time since reconstruction was independently associated with greater quality of life. Reconstructions of the foot were associated with increased levels of discomfort compared to lower leg reconstructions, but not with the trajectory of discomfort. Individual capability subscales demonstrated largely stable recovery trajectories without clinically meaningful differences between tasks. Conclusion: Although the variables identified are mostly non-modifiable, they can inform appropriate expectations before and after deciding on limb salvage. In addition, they can help identify people at greater risk for reduced recovery, who might benefit from targeted interventions such as the integrated involvement of rehabilitation, mental health, and pain management services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.