ReviewFood chemistry: X2026
From static compromise to dynamic design: a polarity modulation paradigm for multiclass veterinary drug residue analysis in complex foods.
Review in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The determination of multiclass veterinary drug residues in food is fundamentally constrained by the irreconcilable conflict between the extremely broad polarity of analytes and the dynamic, heterogeneous nature of complex matrices. Current mainstream sample preparation methods typically rely on static, compromise-driven conditions that limit optimal recovery for polarity-extreme compounds. This review articulates a paradigm shift by establishing the "Dynamic Polarity Window" (DPW) as a framework for rational design. Unlike static methods, DPW enables programmable polarity adjustment across pretreatment stages to match analyte-specific requirements. We critically evaluate conventional techniques through this polarity-centric lens and synthesize a toolkit of programmable strategies-encompassing solvent engineering, salting-out, pH/temperature levers, and microenvironment control-guided by physicochemical parameters. This framework enables the transition from passive, universal extraction to active, on-demand separation, enhancing selectivity and robustness. We finally outline key future directions to bridge the prediction-experiment gap, develop sustainable solvents, and integrate automation for robust residue analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.