Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662391›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Structural heterogeneity of the psychosocial network in adolescent depression: a comparison between first-episode and recurrent patients.

Ruiqiong Xiao, Gege Li, Yingjie Yao, Min Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruiqiong Xiao *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Gege Li *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yingjie YaoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Min YangXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescent depression is a recurrent disorder characterized by progressively severe psychosocial impairment, which is frequently accompanied by a fundamental structural shift in the patient's support ecosystem from real-world interactions to virtual networks. However, the structural heterogeneity of the broader psychosocial network between first-episode and recurrent patients remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 471 adolescents diagnosed with depression, including 171 first-episode and 300 recurrent patients. The study assessed 14 dimensions encompassing internet support, school connection, social adaptation, family care, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms. We estimated Gaussian Graphical Models and conducted a Network Comparison Test to evaluate structural differences between disease stages. Results: In the overall network, interpersonal harmony emerged as the primary central hub, while self-esteem functioned uniquely as a system stabilizer. The Network Comparison Test revealed significant structural differences between the two groups (Max Edge Conclusions: Adolescent depression networks show clinical-stage heterogeneity. Globally, interpersonal harmony acts as the primary central hub, while self-esteem functions as a system stabilizer. In recurrent patients, real-world academic associations are absent; instead, family care forms a specific correlation with self-esteem regulation, and digital networks provide compensatory social connections. Nursing interventions should universally target interpersonal relationships and the cognitive rebalancing of self-esteem. For recurrent patients, clinicians must prioritize family-based self-esteem regulation and utilize digital communities as transitional bridges for social functioning.

Indexed as

adolescent depressiondigital compensationnetwork analysispsychosocial networkrecurrenceself-esteem

Identifiers

PMID42662391
PMCPMC13519595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.