ArticleBioinformation2026
Evaluation of recovery profile and patient satisfaction: Propofol versus sevoflurane-based anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ambulatory surgery requires anesthetic approaches that enable rapid recovery with minimal complications and high patient satisfaction. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia are both preferred options due to their favorable pharmacokinetics, through their recovery profiles differ. This prospective comparative study involved 30 adult patients (ASA I-II) undergoing elective ambulatory surgery, randomly assigned to receive either propofol (Group P) or sevoflurane (Group S) anesthesia. Recovery-related parameters-including eye opening, extubation, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), patient satisfaction and discharge readiness were systematically evaluated. Results revealed similar discharge times between groups, with propofol showing reduced PONV and higher patient satisfaction and sevoflurane offering marginally faster emergence. Thus, we show both agents as effective for day- care anesthesia, with propofol favored for patient comfort and sevoflurane for quicker early recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.