Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662363›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

SpinCastMLAn Open Decision-Making Application for Inverse Design of Electrospinning Manufacturing: A Machine Learning, Optimal Sampling, and Inverse Monte Carlo Approach.

Elisa Roldán, Tasneem Sabir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisa RoldánDepartment of Engineering, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7542
Tasneem SabirManchester Fashion Institute, Faculty of Arts & Humanities, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BG, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospinning enables the fabrication of micro- and nanoscale fibrous materials with highly tunable architectures, yet its rational design remains challenging due to the strongly coupled effects of polymer chemistry and concentration, solvent selection, and processing conditions. The process is intrinsically multivariate and nonlinear; small variations in formulation or operating parameters can shift electrohydrodynamic regimes and generate distinct fiber-diameter distributions. Because functional performance often depends on distribution shape and variability rather than on mean diameter alone, electrospinning design must be addressed as a distributional and chemically constrained problem. SpinCastML is a distribution-aware and chemically constrained inverse-design framework implemented as an open standalone executable. The platform is built on a rigorously curated data set of 68,480 individual fiber-diameter measurements extracted from 1,778 data sets spanning 16 polymers. To address high-dimensional heterogeneity and material imbalance, the framework integrates polymer-balanced Sobol and D-optimal sampling with systematic benchmarking of 11 machine-learning algorithms. Rather than predicting a single scalar outcome, SpinCastML models complete fiber-diameter distributions, enabling quantitative assessment of process robustness and probability of meeting user-defined targets. A Cubist model trained under balanced Sobol+D-optimal sampling achieved robust global predictive performance (R

Identifiers

PMID42662363
PMCPMC13520440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.