Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662359›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Poulomi Roy, Riddhi Chawla, Ashish Kumar, Harshit Pandya, Shikha Rastogi Gupta, Kashyap Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Poulomi RoyDepartment of Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics, Burdwan Dental College and Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
Riddhi ChawlaDepartment of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Central Asian University, Uzbekistan.
Ashish KumarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, NIMS Dental College & Hospital, NIMS University, Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Harshit PandyaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Geetanjali Dental College, Udaipur, India.
Shikha Rastogi GuptaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Geetanjali Dental College, Udaipur, India.
Kashyap ShahDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Goenka Research Institute of Dental Science, Pethapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving optimal primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants remains a clinical challenge because the ideal insertion angle for self-drilling mini-implants has not been clearly established. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate and compare the primary stability of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants inserted into artificial bone blocks at four different angles (30°C, 45°C, 60°C and 90°C) using pull-out resistance testing. Eighty titanium alloy mini-implants (1.6 mm diameter, 8 mm length) were randomly allocated into four groups (n=20 each) and inserted into standardized synthetic bone blocks simulating D2 bone density with a custom angular guide, followed by pull-out testing in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Mini-implants placed at 60°C showed the highest mean pull-out force (324.67 ±28.43 N), followed by 45°C (298.52 ±31.76 N), 90°C (267.38 ±25.91 N) and 30°C (231.14 ± 33.82 N), with statistically significant differences between the groups. Thus, insertion at 60°C to the bone surface provided the high primary stability. It may be considered the biomechanically most favorable angulation for self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.

Indexed as

insertion angleOrthodontic mini-implantprimary stabilitypull-out testtemporary anchorage device (TAD)

Identifiers

PMID42662359
PMCPMC13519489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.