ArticleBioinformation2026
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving optimal primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants remains a clinical challenge because the ideal insertion angle for self-drilling mini-implants has not been clearly established. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate and compare the primary stability of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants inserted into artificial bone blocks at four different angles (30°C, 45°C, 60°C and 90°C) using pull-out resistance testing. Eighty titanium alloy mini-implants (1.6 mm diameter, 8 mm length) were randomly allocated into four groups (n=20 each) and inserted into standardized synthetic bone blocks simulating D2 bone density with a custom angular guide, followed by pull-out testing in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Mini-implants placed at 60°C showed the highest mean pull-out force (324.67 ±28.43 N), followed by 45°C (298.52 ±31.76 N), 90°C (267.38 ±25.91 N) and 30°C (231.14 ± 33.82 N), with statistically significant differences between the groups. Thus, insertion at 60°C to the bone surface provided the high primary stability. It may be considered the biomechanically most favorable angulation for self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.