Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662353›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparative evaluation of bone density after implant placement with and without bone grafting using CBCT.

Gurmej Singh Warval, Debi Prasan Acharya, Sudhir M V S, Satendra Sharma, Mohit Garg, Farahath Mujahid, Kafeel Ahmed Md, Rubeena Naaz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gurmej Singh WarvalDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Debi Prasan AcharyaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College Azamgarh, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sudhir M V SDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Telangana, India.
Satendra SharmaDepartment of Periodontology, KD Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mohit GargDepartment of Periodontology, KD Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Farahath MujahidDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Abeer Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Kafeel Ahmed MdDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Telangana, India.
Rubeena NaazDepartment of Dentistry, SRK Dental Clinic, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of bone grafting on peri-implant bone density and implant stability remains insufficiently defined. Therefore, it is of interest to assess changes in peri-implant bone density after implant placement with and without bone grafting using CBCT. A total of 120 patients were divided into grafted and non-grafted groups, with baseline and follow-up bone density measured radiographically. Grafted sites showed greater improvement in bone density and more favourable osseointegration patterns, although both groups achieved clinically satisfactory outcomes. Thus, we show comparative CBCT-based evidence that bone grafting enhances peri-implant bone quality, supporting its use in compromised bone conditions.

Indexed as

Bone densitybone graftingcone beam computed tomography (CBCT)dental implant

Identifiers

PMID42662353
PMCPMC13519415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.