Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662335›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Assessing root resorption incidence in clear aligner versus fixed orthodontic appliance using CBCT.

Narayana Prasad P, Tarun Sharma, Anupa Rawat, Luv Bhatt, Sumit Joshi, Sonali Bhatt

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Narayana Prasad PDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Tarun SharmaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Anupa RawatDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Luv BhattDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Sumit JoshiDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Sonali BhattDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root resorption is a significant complication in orthodontic treatment that can lead to long-term tooth damage and affects treatment outcomes. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the incidence and severity of root resorption in patients treated with clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic appliance MBT (McLaughlin, Bennett, and Trevisi) using CBCT. Hence, a total of 100 patients (50 per group) were evaluated at baseline, 3 months and 6 months of treatment. The results showed high incidence and severity of root resorption in the fixed orthodontic appliance (MBT) group compared to the clear aligner group. Thus, data offers insights into the selection of safer treatment options.

Indexed as

Clear alignerscone beam computed tomography(CBCT)fixed orthodontic applianceorthodontic treatmentroot resorption

Identifiers

PMID42662335
PMCPMC13519418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.