ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparison of the sealing ability for various bioceramic materials as root-end fillings.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ideal root-end filling material should provide an excellent apical seal, yet the sealing performance of newer bioceramic materials remains uncertain. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the sealing ability of four root-end filling materials on 70 extracted single-rooted human teeth prepared under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, Bioceramic Putty and Bio-C Repair groups and sealing was assessed by dye penetration under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis showed that the newer bioceramic materials sealed better than conventional MTA, with Bioceramic Putty showing the best performance. Thus, we support the clinical potential of bioceramic putty as a promising root-end filling material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.