Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662315›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Effect of light-emitting diode curing tip distance on shear bond strength in metal, ceramic and polycarbonate orthodontic brackets: An

Hemadri S, Kala Vani S V, Firoz Babu Palagiri, Vijaysinh R Tanpure, VLakshmi Sagar, Thejaswini N

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hemadri SDepartment of Orthodontics, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kala Vani S VDepartment of Orthodontics, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Firoz Babu PalagiriDepartment of Orthodontics, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Vijaysinh R TanpureDepartment of Orthodontics, Yashwantrao Chavan Dental College, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India.
VLakshmi SagarDepartment of Orthodontics, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Thejaswini NDepartment of Orthodontics, CKS Teja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate shear bond strength between orthodontic brackets and enamel is essential for successful treatment. However, the effect of LED curing tip distance on different bracket materials remains unclear. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the shear bond strength of stainless-steel, polycarbonate and monocrystalline ceramic and polycrystalline brackets at varying LED curing distances. Two hundred premolars were divided by bracket type and curing distances (0, 6, 8, 10 and 15 mm) and bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. Results showed high bond strength at 0 mm with a significant reduction as distance increased, with stainless-steel and ceramic brackets maintaining clinically acceptable values while polycarbonate brackets showed reduced strength at greater distances. Both bracket material and curing distance significantly influenced shear bond strength, emphasizing the need to minimize curing distance for optimal bonding performance.

Indexed as

ceramic bracketsdistance between curing tipLED curingOrthodontic bracketspolycarbonate bracketsshear bond strength

Identifiers

PMID42662315
PMCPMC13519443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.