ArticleBioinformation2026
Effect of endodontic access design and coronal restoration on fracture resistance.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endodontically treated teeth are prone to fracture due to structural loss following access cavity preparation and restoration. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the effect of access cavity design and coronal restoration on fracture resistance and prosthetic suitability in 120 extracted primary molars and permanent premolars. Conservative access designs showed significantly higher fracture resistance than traditional designs. The crown restorations outperformed composite restorations in both dentitions (p < 0.05). Teeth restored following conservative access showed greater prosthetic suitability, with higher ferrule preservation compared to traditional access designs. Thus Conservative access cavities combined with full-coverage restorations optimize biomechanical performance and prosthetic prognosis in both primary and permanent teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.