Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662309›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Evaluation of surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity among individuals before and after orthodontic treatment - An observational study.

Manikanda Prabu V, Karthikeyan M K, Jeevana Poovalingam, Raj Vikram N, Saravana R, Raja Kumar P

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manikanda Prabu VDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600107, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthikeyan M KDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600107, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jeevana PoovalingamDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600107, Tamil Nadu, India.
Raj Vikram NDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600107, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saravana RDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600107, Tamil Nadu, India.
Raja Kumar PDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600107, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthodontic treatment initially reduces masticatory muscle activity due to discomfort, but gradual occlusal improvement enhances muscle strength and balance, highlighting the need to assess muscle function before and after treatment. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the changes in surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity of masticatory muscles such as temporalis, masseter and digastric muscle before and after orthodontic treatment across different malocclusion. Patients exhibiting malocclusions with class I, II and III were assessed using BioEMG equipment with BioPak analysis software (Digital Dental, NSW and Australia). Temporalis, masseter, and digastric muscles were recorded bilaterally for electromyographic activity at rest, during clenching, and during swallowing. Muscle activity was assessed during orthodontic therapy of pre- and post- treatment values. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data and to compare between pre- and post-treatment paired t test was used. During EMG activity across all three muscles, there were no statistically significant difference observed in class I and Class III subjects during pre and post treatment. In contrast, Class II subjects' particularly female subjects showed significant post-treatment increases in EMG activity of the three muscles indicating neuromuscular adaptation to orthodontic treatment. There was a notable increase seen in muscle activity of temporalis, masseter and digastric in Angles Class II females from pre- and post (6 months) of orthodontic treatment.

Indexed as

digastricmalocclusionmasseterneuromuscular adaptationorthodontic treatmentSurface electromyographytemporalis

Identifiers

PMID42662309
PMCPMC13519444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.