Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662289›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Periodontal outcomes: Surgical exposure versus extraction of impacted maxillary canines.

Tarun Choudhary, Sardhar Malothu, Archisman Mukherjee, Manali Prakash Jadhav, Ritik Roshan, Geetu Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tarun ChoudharyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Sardhar MalothuDepartment of Dentistry, Father Colombo Medical College and Hospital, Warangal, Telangana, India.
Archisman MukherjeeDepartment of Periodontology, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Manali Prakash JadhavDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College & Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
Ritik RoshanDepartment of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Geetu SinghDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Maharishi Markendshwar College of Dental Sciences & Research, Maharishi Markendshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impacted maxillary canines pose a clinical dilemma in selecting an optimal treatment modality while preserving periodontal health. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate periodontal outcomes between surgical exposure with orthodontic traction and extraction in 100 patients over 12 months. Indices assessed included plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss, gingival recession and alveolar bone levels. Results showed significantly greater increases in PPD, CAL, GR and bone loss in the surgical exposure group, while extraction maintained relatively stable periodontal parameters (p < 0.05). Thus, we show integrating periodontal risk assessment into treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines.

Indexed as

Impacted maxillary canineorthodontic tractionperiodontal outcomessurgical exposuretooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID42662289
PMCPMC13519455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.