ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparison of fracture resistance in endodontically treated premolars with extensive MOD cavities restored using different materials: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endodontically treated teeth with extensive coronal destruction are highly susceptible to fracture, making the selection of restorative material critical. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the fracture resistance of sixty maxillary premolars with standardized Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored using different materials. Specimens were divided into six groups and subjected to compressive loading using a universal testing machine, with fracture patterns analyzed under stereomicroscopy. Intact teeth showed the highest fracture resistance, while unrestored teeth showed the lowest; Multicore Flow and Ketac Molar groups demonstrated significantly higher resistance compared to amalgam and sandwich technique groups. Thus, dual-cure composite and glass ionomer cement provided superior reinforcement of weakened tooth structure, highlighting their clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.