ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparative evaluation of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The comparative effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy remains uncertain due to concerns regarding technical complexity and outcomes. Therefore, it is of interest to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes between conventional laparoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery in 200 patients. Patients were equally divided into two groups, with evaluation of operative time, complications, post-operative pain, hospital stay, cosmetic satisfaction and overall outcomes. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes with improved cosmetic satisfaction, through it involved greater technical demands. Thus, we support single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a safe and effective alternative that enhances cosmetic outcomes without compromising clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.