Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662209›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026

Next-generation SNPs from lignin biosynthesis gene and transcription factors reveal a hidden teak (

Nuzhat Bano, Naseer Mohammad, Shamim Akhtar Ansari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nuzhat BanoForest Physiology and Molecular Biology Division, ICFRE-Institute of Forest Productivity, Ranchi, India.
Naseer MohammadGenetics and Tree Improvement Division, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur, India.
Shamim Akhtar AnsariForest Physiology and Molecular Biology Division, ICFRE-Institute of Forest Productivity, Ranchi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Teak ( Methods: A total of 98 SNPs derived from three lignin biosynthesis gene and transcription factors were utilized to estimate the genetic diversity and population structure of teak collected from 10 agro climatic states and maintained at NTGB, Chandrapur, India. Results: Among the studied populations, the Odisha teak population exhibited the highest allelic richness (P% = 88.78%, Na = 1.92, I = 0.32), whereas the Kerala teak population displayed the highest genetic diversity indices (Na (rar) = 1.16, Ne = 1.33, Ho = 0.15, and uHe = 0.20), identifying it as a key hotspot of genetic variation. Structural analysis based on the Pritchard model revealed three gene pools in Indian teak, providing novel genetic evidence that extends beyond the previously recognized two-tier population framework comprising southern and central Indian lineages. The third, previously undetected, hidden gene pool may represent an introduced lineage and is hypothesized to have originated from Myanmar. The high inbreeding coefficient of the third gene pool (F Discussion: These findings reveal a previously unrecognised genetic lineage in Indian teak, providing new insights into its population structure. Accurate documentation of native and introduced gene pools will support the identification of genetic diversity hotspots. The majority of Indian teak belongs to central Indian teak lineage; greater utilization of genetically diverse southern Indian teak could broaden the genetic base and enhance long-term sustainability.

Indexed as

AMOVAcryptic subpopulationinbreeding coefficientminor allele frequencyphylogenetic treeprincipal coordinate analysis

Identifiers

PMID42662209
PMCPMC13519389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.