ArticleCureus2026
Too Young, Too Silent: Painless Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection in a Young Adult.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening vascular emergency that classically presents with severe tearing chest pain. However, painless presentations may occur, resulting in delayed diagnosis and potentially catastrophic outcomes. We report a case of a 34-year-old male who presented with sudden-onset left-sided hemiplegia, slurring of speech, facial deviation, and rapidly worsening sensorium, without any chest pain or prior comorbidities. Initial evaluation revealed threatened airway requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Point-of-care ultrasound and CT panaortogram demonstrated Stanford Type A aortic dissection extending from the ascending aorta to the abdominal aorta with involvement of the right common carotid artery, resulting in acute ischemic stroke and associated aspiration pneumonitis. Thrombolysis was withheld as aortic dissection is an absolute contraindication. This case highlights the importance of considering aortic dissection in young patients presenting with acute stroke and atypical presentations, as early recognition and prompt imaging are crucial to guide appropriate management and to prevent fatal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.