ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) status is a well-established prognostic factor in rectal cancer surgery; however, its long-term oncological relevance has not been prospectively validated in Japan, where upfront surgery has long been widely used. This study assessed the prognostic impact of CRM in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery. Methods: The PRODUCT trial was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted at 18 institutions in Japan. Patients aged ≥ 20 years with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma located within 12 cm from the anal verge and scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic surgery were enrolled. CRM positivity was defined as a margin of ≤ 1 mm. Long-term outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Among 303 eligible patients, CRM positivity was observed in 26 (8.6%). The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in the CRM-positive group than in the CRM-negative group (61.5% vs. 82.3%; log-rank Conclusions: CRM positivity is an adverse prognostic factor in Japanese patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing MIS, underscoring the clinical importance of standardized CRM assessment. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry, Identification Number: UMIN00034365.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.