ReviewPsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2026
Therapeutic Effects of Low-Dose Psilocybin in Depression and Other Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Review in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-dose psilocybin has shown potential in treating various psychiatric disorders, but its perceptual and cognitive effects, along with the risk of adverse events, highlight the need for alternative treatment approaches. One such approach is the use of low-dose psilocybin, which does not significantly alter cognition or perception. While low-dose psilocybin has garnered growing interest in the psychiatric community, its therapeutic efficacy remains unclear and warrants further investigation. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose-whether in the form of microdosing or low-dose control conditions in clinical trials-psilocybin for mental disorders. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all empirical evidence involving low-dose psilocybin in human subjects for psychiatric treatment from inception to June 2024. We also searched for relevant registered clinical trials on clinicaltrials.gov. Results: We identified five registered clinical trials and six publications, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (3, 50%), secondary outcome studies (2, 33%), and case report (1, 16%). Four studies (66%) included concurrent psychotherapy. Doses ranged from 1-3 mg per 70 kg as a single dose or 0.1-0.2 g of dried psilocybin-containing mushrooms every 3 days for up to 3 years. Two RCTs studied treatment-resistant depression with 1, 10, and 25 mg psilocybin doses. In the 1 mg group, 18% of participants showed a significant response, 8% achieved remission, and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score improved by -5.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.1 to -2.7) at week 3, though only 10% maintained this by week 12. Another study found transient improvements in anxiety and cognitive function with 1 mg. One trial reported no significant improvement with 1-3 mg doses, though 12% achieved anxiety remission and 16% depression remission. An RCT comparing 25 mg to 1 mg plus escitalopram found higher response rates with 25 mg than 1 mg group, although no significant difference in rumination or thought suppression between groups was observed. Conclusion: The empirical evidence for the efficacy of low-dose psilocybin in treating mental disorders is limited. The current research is constrained by a lack of well-designed studies that compare low-dose psilocybin to placebo. To better understand its potential, future research should include large, rigorous RCTs specifically focused on assessing low-dose protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.