ArticleBioinformation2026
Effect of guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable membranes on periodontal regeneration in grade II furcation defects.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grade II furcation defects pose a significant therapeutic challenge in periodontology due to their complex anatomy and limited accessibility for effective regeneration. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the efficacy of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) using a bioresorbable collagen membrane compared to open flap debridement (OFD) alone in 48 patients with mandibular molar Grade II furcation defects. Clinical parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, horizontal probing depth and gingival recession) and radiographic bone fill were assessed at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. The GTR group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in PD reduction (3.42 ± 0.78 mm vs 2.18 ± 0.65 mm), CAL gain (2.89 ± 0.72 mm vs 1.54 ± 0.58 mm), HPD reduction (2.67 ± 0.54 mm vs 1.23 ± 0.48 mm) and bone fill (48.6 ± 12.3% vs 22.4 ± 9.8%) compared to OFD (p<0.001). GTR with a bioresorbable collagen membrane provides superior clinical and radiographic outcomes, supporting its use as an effective regenerative approach for Grade II furcation defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.