Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42662032›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Cone -beam computed tomographic (CBCT) analysis of root canal volume changes with OneShape, standard Mani -silk and BlueFlex acer file: An

Mandeep Kaur, Renu Bala Sroa, Baljeet Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mandeep KaurDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Government Dental College & Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Renu Bala SroaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Government Dental College & Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Baljeet KumarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Government Dental College & Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over-instrumentation can result in excessive and inappropriate dentin removal, especially in root canals with complex internal anatomy. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate changes in root canal volume of permanent mandibular premolars after preparation with OneShape, Standard Mani-Silk and Blueflex Acer file using CBCT and 3D reconstruction. Hence, 45 teeth were divided into three groups, instrumented with the respective file systems and pre- and post-instrumentation canal volumes were measured using Blue Sky Plan and MeshMixer software. The results showed that all file systems significantly increased canal volume (p<0.001), with Blueflex Acer file producing the highest volume change, followed by OneShape and Standard Mani-Silk the least. Standard Mani-Silk showed the best preservation of canal anatomy, suggesting its suitability for conservative endodontic preparation.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionBlueFlex acer filecanal volume changecone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)nickel-titanium filesOneShape fileRoot canal preparationstandard Mani-silk file

Identifiers

PMID42662032
PMCPMC13519458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.