Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661962›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparative evaluation of different post materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth: Implications for prosthodontic restorations.

Ruchita Kishor Rathod, Shikha Gupta, Samreen Fatma, Priyanka Palat, Aquib Ishaque, Sagar Hiwale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruchita Kishor RathodDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pacific Dental College and Research Center, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Shikha GuptaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Medanta Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Samreen FatmaDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India.
Priyanka PalatDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pacific Dental College and Research Center, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Aquib IshaqueDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pacific Dental College and Research Center, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sagar HiwaleDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-radicular posts are routinely used in restoring endodontically treated teeth to enhance retention and evenly distribute functional loads. The material of the post plays a critical role in stress transmission within the tooth and supporting structures, directly influencing long-term prognosis. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate stress distribution patterns among different post materials, specifically fiber-reinforced composite, cast metal and stainless steel posts. Fiber posts, due to their modulus of elasticity similar to dentin, showed more favorable stress dispersion and reduced risk of root fracture in biomechanical analyses. Metallic posts exhibited stress concentration at apical and cervical regions, increasing fracture susceptibility. Thus, we show the importance of considering biomechanical compatibility, not just strength and retention, when selecting post materials to improve restoration longevity and overall clinical success.

Indexed as

Endodontically treated teethfiber-reinforced composite postsprosthodontic restorationsstainless steel posts

Identifiers

PMID42661962
PMCPMC13519409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.