Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661958›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

School-based one health education shapes young minds and households to prevent zoonoses: A comparison of four teaching strategies.

Lorena Diniz Macedo Silva Maia, Breno Oliveira Lima Ramos, Marcelo Teixeira Paiva, Érica Lorenza Martins Araújo, Mariana Gomes Leal, Daniel Luiz de Miranda Cravo, Ana Clara Novaes, Isadora Martins Pinto Coelho, Clarice Lara Moreira, Ana Luisa Martins Brum and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lorena Diniz Macedo Silva MaiaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Breno Oliveira Lima RamosDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcelo Teixeira PaivaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Érica Lorenza Martins AraújoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mariana Gomes LealDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Daniel Luiz de Miranda CravoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Clara NovaesDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Isadora Martins Pinto CoelhoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Clarice Lara MoreiraDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Luisa Martins BrumDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rafael Romero NicolinoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Danielle Ferreira de Magalhães SoaresDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Camila Stefanie Fonseca de OliveiraDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health education initiatives have received increasing attention in public policy; however, empirical evidence on the comparative efficacy of different teaching strategies remains limited. This study evaluated four educational approaches: group discussion, theater, board games, and traditional board-based instruction, among 166 elementary school students participating in activities focused on zoonoses, including rabies, sporotrichosis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and leishmaniasis. Adjusted exploratory analyses showed higher knowledge gain for board game than for group discussion, while no statistically significant differences were detected among the other strategies. Post-intervention scores were significantly higher than pre-intervention scores, indicating knowledge gains after the educational activities. The proportion of correct responses related to zoonoses increased from 15.7% to 56.6% (

Indexed as

Elementary school studentsHealth educationOne healthZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID42661958
PMCPMC13519258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.