ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Establishing reliable neural health measures in adult cochlear implant users.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following cochlear implantation, measures of auditory nerve function based on implant-driven electrical stimulation can be used to characterize neural health and support longitudinal monitoring and treatment outcome assessment, with particular relevance for advanced therapies targeting neural hearing loss. This study evaluated the reliability and measurement precision of neural-health measures derived from three complementary electrode-specific tests: panoramic electrically-evoked compound action potentials (PECAPs), interphase-gap (IPG) effects, and polarity effects. Six experienced adult cochlear implant users were assessed across five sessions by trained audiologists. PECAPs were measured across all electrodes, while IPG and polarity effects were assessed at three electrodes per participant. Test-retest reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), with measurements repeated over intervals ranging from 1 day to several weeks. Measurement error was further characterized using the minimum detectable change (MDC), defined as the smallest change required to exceed measurement error with 95% confidence. PECAPs neural-responsiveness measure and polarity effect on comfort levels demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90), while IPG effects on ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF) slope showed good reliability (ICC > 0.80). Other variables showed moderate reliability, including polarity effect on threshold, and IPG effects on ECAP maximum amplitude, threshold, and AGF offset. MDC estimates indicated that relatively small within-electrode changes would be sufficient to exceed measurement error at the individual participant-electrode level. Exploratory analyses showed limited associations between measures, consistent with the idea that they may reflect distinct aspects of neural status. Together, these findings establish PECAPs, IPG effects and polarity effects as reproducible and complementary measures of auditory nerve health suitable for longitudinal assessment. Their combined use provides a robust physiological framework for monitoring neural status and detecting therapy-related changes in cochlear implant users, including in clinical studies of interventions targeting neural hearing loss. Further standardization of testing and analysis protocols, alongside expansion to larger multicentre cohorts will strengthen the generalizability and facilitate broader clinical and research adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.