ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Interpretable machine learning for identifying co-occurring internet addiction and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation in older adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internet addiction and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation may co-occur in later life, yet evidence-based approaches for identifying this co-occurrence remain limited. This study developed and interpreted a machine learning classifier to distinguish community-dwelling older adults with versus without current co-occurrence. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,471 adults aged 60 years or older in China. Candidate predictors included demographic characteristics, general well-being, family functioning, and social support. Methods: After preprocessing, correlation-based collinearity screening and ten-fold cross-validated LASSO regression were used for feature selection. Five models, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, and multilayer perceptron, were developed using the training set and internally validated in a randomly held-out test set. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility metrics, and SHAP was applied for model interpretation. Results: Eight predictors were retained: general well-being, support utilization, age, gender, educational attainment, marital status, objective support, and living with children. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) showed the best overall performance in the test set, with an AUROC of 0.904, accuracy of 0.816, sensitivity of 0.810, specificity of 0.818, and Brier score of 0.118. SHAP analysis identified general well-being as the dominant predictor, followed by educational attainment and objective support. Lower well-being, older age, male gender, higher educational attainment, and not being married or partnered were generally associated with a higher model-predicted probability of current co-occurrence; higher support utilization was also associated with a higher predicted probability, particularly at lower levels of general well-being. Conclusion: This interpretable classifier may facilitate the identification of co-occurring conditions among community-dwelling older adults. Given its cross-sectional design, the model distinguishes current co-occurrence status rather than predicting future onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.