ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Probabilistic forecasting of under-five mortality in Uganda: implications for monitoring SDG 3.2.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tracking Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2 progress requires both explicit quantification of uncertainty and point estimates. Deterministic trend analysis, which has poor predictive power for reaching SDG targets, is the basis for most country-specific estimates of under-five mortality. Methods: Probabilistic time series forecasting was used to analyse Uganda's annual under-five mortality data. Forecasts were created using Autoregressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average (ARFIMA) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models through 2030. Rolling-origin root mean square error, Taylor diagram and residual diagnostics calibration were used to evaluate predictive accuracy. SDG 3.2-anchored metrics were computed, including the likelihood of achieving these goals by 2030, the absolute gaps that still exist, and the required annual rates of decline. Results: The ARIMA model predicts sustained declines in under-five mortality based on the available data but remains well above the target of 25 deaths per 1,000 live births set in SDG 3.2 by 2030. The model estimates a mortality gap of about 17.68 deaths per 1,000 live births, corresponding to a 1.98% probability of reaching the SDG target by 2030. Overall, these results suggest that the current rate of decline is insufficient to meet the target, and an average annual reduction of approximately 10.3% is necessary to achieve SDG 3.2. Even though the ARFIMA model showed moderate long-memory dependence, it produced substantially higher forecast errors and less stable long-term projections than the ARIMA model. Consequently, the ARIMA model was identified as the more accurate and reliable approach to predict under-five mortality in Uganda. Conclusion: Despite realised values falling within anticipated uncertainty limits, Uganda is not on track to meet the SDG 3.2 under-five mortality target for 2030 based on current trends. A clear and practical method for monitoring the SDGs while accounting for uncertainty is probabilistic forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.